Typical starting points
When this service is a good fit
- Recurring research and knowledge tasks
- Multi-step processes spanning several systems
- Manual hand-offs between tools and teams
- Assistants for internal or external users
Custom AI agent development
We build AI agents that handle defined tasks, use approved tools and interact with existing data sources or APIs. Responsibilities, permissions and failure paths are deliberately constrained rather than left open-ended.

Typical starting points
Scope
Use cases
The right architecture depends on the process, data, existing systems and the cost of a wrong decision. These examples are common use cases, not blanket recommendations.
Decision criteria
We first assess whether AI genuinely adds value compared with conventional software, search or workflow automation for the specific task.
Quality and control
Non-deterministic outputs should not be judged from a handful of impressive demos. We define representative test cases, observe failure patterns and design fallbacks or human approvals where the business context requires them.
How we work
We do not start with a model name. We start with the process, users, available data and technical constraints. From there, we design an architecture that balances business value, privacy, cost, maintainability and operations.
At the start, we clarify the current situation, users, data sources, integrations and quality requirements. If core assumptions are still open, we shape an initial phase specifically to test those assumptions.
The software is developed iteratively against real data and interfaces. Critical integrations and AI capabilities are tested early so technical risks become visible before the end of the project.
For production systems, monitoring, cost control, logging, failure paths and model or provider changes are part of the architecture. An AI project does not end with an impressive demo.
Frequently asked questions
Direct answers to points that should be clarified before making a technical decision.
A chatbot typically responds to user input. An agent can also break a goal into steps, call tools and execute defined actions. That can create more value, but it also raises the bar for permissions, testing and failure handling.
Yes, where suitable APIs or controlled interfaces are available. Direct actions should be protected by explicit permissions, validation and traceable logs.
When a process is fully predictable and rule-based, a deterministic workflow is often simpler, cheaper and more reliable. Agents are most useful when inputs or decision steps are genuinely variable.
Yes. Typical projects connect an agent to internal data sources, APIs or line-of-business systems. The important design questions are restricted permissions, auditable tool calls and human approval for critical actions.
Yes, provided suitable interfaces exist. Integration should be server-side, use minimal privileges, validate actions, log relevant events and define clear failure paths.
Related services
In an initial conversation, we clarify the objective, current situation and sensible next steps.
To get started, your objective, existing systems and the main open question are enough.